BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
X-WR-CALNAME;VALUE=TEXT:Origins Forum - Origin of Archean sulfur mass-independent fractionation and its implication to Earth’s early atmosphere - (Shuhei Ono - MIT)
PRODID:-//Harvard events data//EN
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:event_682271_0
SUMMARY:Origins Forum - Origin of Archean sulfur mass-independent fractionation and its implication to Earth’s early atmosphere - (Shuhei Ono - MIT)
DESCRIPTION:<p>Abstract:</p><p>Signatures of sulfur isotope mass-independent fractionations (S-MIF) in Archean sulfate and sulfide minerals have been considered as the most convincing evidence for early anoxic atmosphere, and constrain the atmospheric oxygen level to less than a few ppm until before 2.3 Ga [1] [2]. Despite the critical importance in understanding early evolutionary history of atmospheric oxygen and biosphere, the source reaction(s) and physical mechanism of S-MIF are poorly constrained.  Detailed mechanistic understanding of physical origin of MIF is expected to provide critical constraints on the atmospheric chemistry and ultraviolet light transparency of Earth’s early atmosphere beyond the absence of molecular oxygen, and thus, provide environmental contexts for the origin of life.  </p><p>Since the pioneering study by Farquhar et al., [3] SO<sub>2</sub> photolysis with &lt;220 nm UV radiation has been the main candidate for the source of S-MIF. Later laboratory photochemistry experiments, however, yield much smaller magnitude S-MIF [4] [5]. Theoretical <em>ab initio </em>calculations suggest only weak perturbations in the C state SO<sub>2</sub> [6]. Furthermore, the latest spectroscopy measurements showed small isotopologue dependent cross section amplitude difference [7]. What is the S-MIF source reaction if it is not SO<sub>2</sub> photolysis? SO<sub>2</sub> photoexcitation at 240 to 340 nm produces large MIF [8]. The long life time of the low lying 3B excited state allows expression of isotopologue specific perturbation in the photochemical products (organic-S or sulfate). In addition, photochemistry of SO and S<sub>2</sub> could be the source of S-MIF. Photochemical model suggests the preservation of S-MIF signal from SO (and S<sub>2</sub>) would be more favored than that from SO<sub>2</sub> photolysis [9]. I will discuss implications for the early sulfur cycle and pO<sub>2</sub> constraints if SO<sub>2</sub> photolysis is not the S-MIF source reaction.</p><p>[1] Farquhar et al. (2000) <em>Science </em><strong>289</strong>, 756-758 [2] Pavlov&amp; Kasting, (2002) <em>Astrobiology </em><strong>2</strong>, 27-41 [3] Farquhar et al., (2001) <em>J Geophys Res </em><strong>106</strong>, 32829-32839 [4] Masterson et al., (2011) <em>Earth Planet Sci Lett </em><strong>306</strong>, 253-260 [5] Ono et al., (2013) <em>J Geophys Res </em><strong>118</strong>, 2444-2454 [6] Tokue &amp; Nanbu, (2010) <em>J Chem Phys </em><strong>132</strong>, 024301 [7] Endo <em>et al.</em>, (2015) <em>J Geophys Res </em>[8] Whitehill <em>et al.</em>, (2013) <em>PNAS </em><strong>110</strong>, 17697- 17702 [9] Ono et al., (2003) <em>Earth Planet Sci lett </em><strong>213</strong>, 15-30 </p>
LOCATION:Haller Hall
STATUS:CONFIRMED
DTSTART:20160217T210000Z
DTEND:20160217T210000Z
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR